|
Post by michaelcorvin on May 22, 2018 16:58:30 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ag47 on May 22, 2018 21:01:58 GMT
-Michaelcorvin Very interesting story and picture. Thank you.
|
|
|
Post by phantomlizzy on May 23, 2018 20:51:37 GMT
Here’s a video by MattSquatch about it. He said he will post any updates on the topic. youtu.be/F4vnOqiTK48
|
|
|
Post by whitefeather on May 24, 2018 14:09:00 GMT
That is a very interesting photo. I hope someone posts the DNA results when they're available. To me it looks most like an immature, underweight brown bear, but without seeing the paws and rear haunches (tail?) I'm not at all confident that's what it actually is.
Thank you for posting!
|
|
|
Post by Wolf's Rain on May 25, 2018 14:38:55 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Wolf's Rain on May 25, 2018 15:22:53 GMT
|
|
|
Post by michaelcorvin on May 25, 2018 17:17:45 GMT
|
|
|
Post by phantomlizzy on May 25, 2018 18:27:31 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ag47 on May 25, 2018 18:31:13 GMT
Call me cynical, but how much you wanna bet: 1. the DNA and body will just disappear, or 2. be explained away as something mundane (dogman equivalent of a weather balloon), or 3. we'll just never hear any more about it... The KXLO article is 404'd already:
|
|
|
Post by ag47 on May 25, 2018 18:32:54 GMT
By the way, unrelated, but a big bear came out of the bushes and ran across in front of my car yesterday morning in broad daylight. Funny, when its snout came out of the brush by the road, it was very low to the ground and I did not immediately think bear, but a lot of other things....
...anyway, it sort of made my day.
|
|
adam
New Member
Posts: 1
|
Post by adam on May 26, 2018 6:22:38 GMT
Sorry, but those pics do not resemble a dogman in any way. That is a wolf, dogman have torsos and legs that are more way more muscular human then wolf
|
|
|
Post by whitefeather on May 26, 2018 11:03:06 GMT
Not normally the way my mind works, but I just have to say the first photo I saw from the now 404'd article AG47 mentioned looks quite a bit different than the three in Michaelcorvin's response above. Specifically the paw in the above photo seems inconsistently small compared to the size of the foreleg pictured in the missing article, which didn't include the paw.
Could easily be nothing other than a variation in camera angle or distance, just something I noticed.
|
|
|
Post by Wolfhound on May 26, 2018 14:48:14 GMT
I agree with what white feather said. I was thinking the same thing; to me, it doesn't look like the same animal.
|
|
|
Post by whitefeather on Jun 1, 2018 13:00:47 GMT
If the likes on my post are an indication, it would seem the possibility that the photo's are not of the same animal has at least crossed the minds of a few other members.
I genuinely hope that is not the case. I am not a conspiracy theorist as the term is usually applied, but if anyone at all is making an effort to alter evidentiary information the likelihood of us ever getting near the truth is dramatically reduced.
As AG47 can attest, I've already repeatedly called into question conflicting details given in a number of reports.
|
|
|
Post by phantomlizzy on Jun 1, 2018 18:23:20 GMT
whitefeather , now that you mention it, the new pictures look very different from the original that was posted. I rewatched MattSquatch's video and you can clearly see that the ear in rounded and the front legs are bigger than in the new pictures.
|
|