|
Post by peterandthewolf on Apr 23, 2021 3:51:47 GMT
Search for the beast of bray road Episode 1 : www.bitchute.com/video/6O3bTDMMSpVJ/Episode 2 : www.bitchute.com/video/uXEdYNRh9f5Q/I had high hopes for this but Linda Godfrey refuses to mention dogman during her interview in episode 2 Did she sell out ? Shame especially when they got footage of dogman on the thermal camera and on the drone with thermal camera in episode 2 Note to moderators. I have not linked any torrent site links to these episodes or links to file sites to download from 😃
|
|
|
Post by carljenkins on Apr 23, 2021 4:50:27 GMT
I will have to check these out.
|
|
|
Post by somerandomuser on Apr 23, 2021 23:41:37 GMT
Watching now, btw I met a gentleman locally two days ago in my travels who owns (privately) a few wolves being that I have zero experience with them I will be picking his mind and learning more about wolf behavior.
Edit: Remember that the premise of the show is just focused on Bray Road so perhaps just for the show the overall overarching dogman and other hotspots would probably not be mentioned.
Edit to the Edit: The thermal footage is interesting it did appear to be on two legs which was starkly different than when it was on four, really interesting. I wish that footage in full would be released if these shows really are interested in the truth it should be released and at the highest quality. I found that the scratches and wolf hair and subsequent DNA was also interesting that hair was at 5 feet off the deck if the estimate was correct then it's interesting only thing I can think is that the wolf had cornered something in a tree. The scratches found also are interesting like I wish they had measured how far they were across and how many scratches were there, that straight up and down might be a mountain lion sharpening it's claws.
|
|
|
Post by peterandthewolf on Apr 24, 2021 3:02:51 GMT
|
|
|
Post by somerandomuser on Apr 25, 2021 4:19:21 GMT
It could be that they are lying, but then again what if the lab lied to them? I think that any show would want to show the evidence of what they found if it is of remarkable importance then who knows sponsors (advertisers) may buy ads on a special. Josh Gates tends to hit the news when he finds things of interest I would think that had the DNA been something of real interest then they would seek that publicity again. Now it could be that they found something of real interest and they sit on it because they want to verify the finding or to further investigate without having lots of people around, I can see this go down.
|
|
|
Post by peterandthewolf on Apr 25, 2021 6:57:14 GMT
What did you all think of the Linda Godfrey interview ? Did she sell out ?
|
|
|
Post by Kiyona on Apr 25, 2021 16:06:21 GMT
Search for the beast of bray road Episode 1 : www.bitchute.com/video/6O3bTDMMSpVJ/Episode 2 : www.bitchute.com/video/uXEdYNRh9f5Q/I had high hopes for this but Linda Godfrey refuses to mention dogman during her interview in episode 2 Did she sell out ? Shame especially when they got footage of dogman on the thermal camera and on the drone with thermal camera in episode 2 Note to moderators. I have not linked any torrent site links to these episodes or links to file sites to download from 😃 Thanks those are really good quality video links!
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota watcher on Apr 25, 2021 19:25:18 GMT
No Linda Godfrey sellout at all. She referred the investigators to a credible recent eyewitness. Linda did seem fragile during the walking interview and I believe she has had health problems.
The investigation was one of those quick hits with no clear results. The show concludes that the animal was a gray wolf and that eyewitnesses likely have misidentified it. But that quick and very broad conclusion does not take into account that huge footprint they could not identify. So it was a superficial investigation with an unwarranted conclusion.
|
|
|
Post by peterandthewolf on Apr 26, 2021 2:07:59 GMT
Why didnt she mention Dogman ? Why didnt she tell them look up Dogman ?
|
|
|
Post by somerandomuser on Apr 26, 2021 4:26:59 GMT
The show title then confusing viewers with the overarching term of "dogman" would not make much sense. Remember that some people think only bigfoot lives in PNW, possibly the same assumption is made here at least for the casual viewer. There is a fine line between bringing enough to show something maybe out there but not throwing the public into a panic. It's a very tight rope to walk, I used to think that people were rational and can understand quite a bit but the more I deal with people the less I believe in that and less faith I have in people. I see people thinking war with certain countries is just about to happen (hours, days, maybe months away) never mind some 70+ years of avoiding all out war and various research agreements (known or unknown) which both the belligerents worked upon together during the height of tensions. When I tell people that Switzerland, Canada and other friendly countries talk with those in the news who are supposed to be our enemies on our behalf and direct talks occur in order to reassure one another they can't believe it. Instead they prefer to buy into hype and a lack of common sense. Now imagine that the average person watching the show is told they are everywhere and really odd DNA was found, a certain segment will basically have a conniption and some have been so browbeat into accepting the world as it is they can't accepting anything but that. Even if that segment who loses it is small it'd be enough to cause actual and serious problems. Once again some people just don't accept facts be it that the facts are stated or unstated but true. You know no one likes being lied to but the breadcrumbs are out there for all to see it's just a matter of them seeing and evaluating what they found then drawing their own conclusions, this is true for many things which one may have questions about. Videos, audio and pictures literally are not accepted as proof and the only acceptable proof is a body; Not even DNA is proof because if the DNA is too strange then contamination is the first thing to discredit that evidence. It's too easy to discredit evidence and is much hard to discredit say a body, of course once one of any cryptid is brought in there will be people that think it is only relegated to where the body was taken, it's literally too much for the average person to accept things that are strange can be everywhere.. it's a huge insecurity issue for most people.
I really like what Minnesota Watcher said and was on point.
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota watcher on Apr 26, 2021 22:46:11 GMT
Thanks, someradomuser! Your posts are always informative. Keep it up . . .
|
|