|
Post by somerandomuser on May 12, 2021 2:40:53 GMT
www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOmZ1__aQF4A pretty interesting conversation. Really oddly I think primate some kind of primate that Roger ran into. Edit: Overall a really good discussion hard questions shouldn't be skirted by either party just because it's a point of contention. I think if I could ask anything it would be: Why did he wait for so long and what was the initial spark that spurred him to come forward? Seeing that it doesn't seem that he is much into conspiracy theories what was the catalyst? Also how did he stumble across the LBL story on the internet or youtube? Was he searching to see if all these years later there was something about the incident or something else had him go down the rabbit hole then he stumbled onto the story, if so what was it? In hind sight does he believe that perhaps the watchful or protective nature of Walt maybe was an attempt at manipulation seeing that at the time he was quite vulnerable and the gentle touch would have garnered better results? I know that this is the last time he comes out due to a contract with a media company but just questions I wonder about.
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota watcher on May 14, 2021 1:19:43 GMT
The first hour or so features a productive interview between Roger, the supposed LBL witness, and NADP regional leader Nick Valente. Nick asks questions similar to those asked earlier by Joedy Cook but the tone is less conflictual. No stunning new revelations and Josh Turner does a good job moderating. The big news is that Roger again has an agreement with a network for a production. In that production, Roger will present his full name and visage and also reveal the full names of the victims. Worth a listen.
|
|
|
Post by somerandomuser on May 14, 2021 6:08:14 GMT
Oddly I think that we may really be looking at very similar yet different incidents, just a real feeling I get. It seems that the LBL area has had a few incidents as with such things the corroboration will vary oddly I think that some of the more verifiable incidents are not meant to be discussed and someone works very hard to hide them.
Edit: I agree that yes the conversation was more cordial, but once again nothing really added to the story.
|
|