|
|
Post by michaelcorvin on Jun 4, 2018 22:50:05 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by ag47 on Jun 4, 2018 22:58:35 GMT
Whoa!
Gnarly, look at that thing!
Not sure, but to me the skin looks reptilian, though.
----------------------
Ok, that was my initial reaction before reading any of it.
Now, as that guy, Paul What's-His-Name, used to say, the rest of the story:
Really neat thing to come across. If I'd found that in the wild, I would have flipped my lid. Really had me going.
|
|
|
|
Post by michaelcorvin on Jun 18, 2018 4:18:50 GMT
Whoa! Gnarly, look at that thing! Not sure, but to me the skin looks reptilian, though. ---------------------- Ok, that was my initial reaction before reading any of it. Now, as that guy, Paul What's-His-Name, used to say, the rest of the story: Really neat thing to come across. If I'd found that in the wild, I would have flipped my lid. Really had me going. I must say, it looks pretty much the same as the Kangaroo |
|
|
|
Post by ag47 on Jun 18, 2018 8:53:45 GMT
I had never really seen a kangaroo hand up close and never seen one detached, until the photos.
So, yeah, it would have given me pause had I found one in that state. No apologies for that.
When I was a kid I found a cow jawbone in the woods. That gave me a start too out of the cow. What's really interesting is that I never did get an explanation as to why it was there.
And yes, the roo hand in a flat, two dimensional photo, does have an almost reptilian texture to it.
I'm not a zoologist, just a person looking for answers like others here. No apologies.
|
|
|
|
Post by ag47 on Jun 19, 2018 0:01:59 GMT
Thread is closed. It's a kangaroo hand. End of story.
|
|
